Evaluation of Stress Urinary Incontinence
1/1/2016 - William D. Po, MD
Mentor: Christopher M. Zahn, MD
Editor: Vanessa Gregg, MD
There are several different types of urinary incontinence: stress, urge, chronic urinary retention (overflow), mixed, and others. An appropriate evaluation is essential to determine appropriate treatment options. In general, the evaluation should include history, urinalysis, physical exam, demonstration of stress incontinence, assessment of urethral mobility, and the measurement of a post-void residual (PVR) volume.
Differentiating complicated from uncomplicated stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is important. Uncomplicated SUI is defined as leakage on valsalva or physical exertion without symptoms associated with urgency or retention, and is classically associated with absence of infection and voiding symptoms. In addition to stress incontinence, complicated SUI may include urgency, retention, and voiding symptoms, and patients may have comorbid conditions that impact continence. Many patients will also have undergone prior anti-incontinence surgery.
A careful history includes precipitating events, frequency, severity, pad use, and effects on the activities of daily living. Other questions regarding the presence and frequency of nocturia, urgency, hesitancy, slow stream, feeling of incomplete empting, and dysuria may be asked as well. There are many validated questionnaires available to assist in completing the history; voiding diaries may also be used. Medication history (assessing medications and agents that may affect bladder function), medical history (assessing the presence of conditions such as diabetes and neurologic disorders), and gynecologic, past surgical, and obstetrical histories should be obtained.
The physical exam should assess for factors that may contribute to the patient’s symptoms, such as a urethral diverticulum or a fistula. Any pelvic organ prolapse will need to be evaluated and reduced to determine if SUI is being masked. Pelvic organ prolapse that extends past the hymen may necessitate multichannel urodynamic testing.
Depending on history and exam, a urinalysis to identify urinary tract infection may be the only necessary laboratory evaluation.
Before surgery is performed, stress urinary incontinence should be objectively demonstrated. Visualizing leakage with a cough is diagnostic (with a full bladder or at least 300 ml of fluid and the patient standing if needed). However, a delay in leakage may be due to cough-induced detrusor over-activity. If there is a delay or if leakage is not demonstrated, multichannel testing is recommended.
Surgical outcomes are more successful in patients with urethral mobility. The cotton swab test is positive when there is a 30 degree or greater displacement from the horizontal when the patient is in the supine lithotomy position and straining.
A post void residual volume of less than 150 ml can help exclude a bladder-emptying abnormality or chronic urinary retention (overflow incontinence). An abnormal volume may necessitate multichannel testing. Simple office cystometry with a catheter and syringe can aid in determining post void residual, basic bladder capacity, and ensuring at least 300 ml for valsalva leakage testing. Multichannel urodynamic testing is not needed with uncomplicated SUI prior to surgery.
In cases of complicated SUI, multichannel urodynamic testing is typically indicated. The goal of multichannel evaluation is to objectively monitor bladder function and dysfunction so the appropriate treatment can be precisely determined. Multichannel evaluation can measure changes to intra-abdominal and intra-vesical pressures, and measure detrusor activity. Uroflowmetry can be performed to assess the voiding rate, pattern, and capacity. Filling cystometry (cystometrogram [CMG]) measures pressure and volume in the bladder during filling, storage in the context of sensation, and compliance. The competency of the urethra is assessed by the valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP) and the urethral pressure profile (UPP). Electromyography may be performed to confirm proper coordination between the bladder and pelvic floor muscles.
The American College of Obstetrics & Gynecology; Committee Opinion No. 603: Evaluation of uncomplicated stress urinary incontinence in women before surgical treatment.; Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;123(6):1403-7. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000450759.34453.31.
Initial approval November 2015; Reaffirmed May 2017, November 2018.
********** Notice Regarding Use ************
The Foundation for Exxcellence in Women’s Health, Inc (“Foundation”) is committed to accuracy and will review and validate all Pearls on an ongoing basis to reflect current practice.
This document is designed to aid practitioners in providing appropriate obstetric and gynecologic care. Recommendations are derived from major society guidelines and high quality evidence when available, supplemented by the opinion of the author and editorial board when necessary. It should not be construed as dictating an exclusive course of treatment or procedure to be followed.
Variations in practice may be warranted when, in the reasonable judgment of the treating clinician, such course of action is indicated by the condition of the patient, limitations of available resources, or advances in knowledge or technology. The Foundation reviews the articles regularly; however, its publications may not reflect the most recent evidence. While we make every effort to present accurate and reliable information, this publication is provided “as is” without any warranty of accuracy, reliability, or otherwise, either express or implied. The Foundation does not guarantee, warrant, or endorse the products or services of any firm, organization, or person. Neither the Foundation, the ABOG, SASGOG nor their respective officers, directors, members, employees, or agents will be liable for any loss, damage, or claim with respect to any liabilities, including direct, special, indirect, or consequential damages, incurred in connection with this publication or reliance on the information presented.
Copyright 2018 The Foundation for Exxcellence in Women's Health, Inc. All rights reserved. No re-print, duplication or posting allowed without prior written consent.Back to Search Results